This weeks lab provided insight into different methods used with crime hotspot analysis. and explored the differences between global and local approaches.
The lecture defines global clustering as a pattern which produces a single statistic with confidence intervals and local clustering which produces a hotspot. Some of the more notable methods for determining local clusters are grid-based mapping, local Moran's I, kernel density, Gi*, and Nearset Neighbor Hierarchical (NNH). These method combined data aggregation provide valuable insights for decision makers to improve their community.
Kernel Density Hotspot |
Geographic Boundary Hotspot |
Some examples of hotspot mapping found in the lab is shown above, which show a kernel density of assault and choropleth map of burglary rate. Below are examples of grid-based, kernel density, and local Moran's I hotspot mapping.
Finally, the lab concluded with creating a table which provide a matrix (not shown) to evaluate the different methods. Utilizing the information found in the map and the matrix the kernel density and local Moran's I offered the greatest crime hotspot insight, where the the local Moran's I performed slightly better.
No comments:
Post a Comment